What do people in your organization buy into as the definition of leadership? Isn't there plenty of definitions, misconceptions, and myths that people embrace about leaders and leadership?
Fifteen years ago, John Maxwell taught me in The Law of Influence that, "leadership is influence, nothing more, nothing less." I have embraced this definition of leadership for some time. Leadership is the ability to obtain followers. Therefore, a leader must work on that ability of becoming a person of influence that others willfully follow.
One of the misunderstandings people have about leadership is that want to think it is based on position. Positional leadership is more about rights and titles. Leaders who uses their title as a right to lead will eventually, overtime, fall flat in their leadership.
Like William Wallace (played by Mel Gibson in Braveheart) said, "Men don't follow titles, they follow courage." That quote speaks volume. Leadership titles don not necessarely make you a leader.
Influential leadership really has more to do with relational than positional. Positional leaders, John Maxwell points out, do not generally stoop to help others; relational leaders do. Relational leaders are intent on finding ways to increase their influence index (developing, equipping, empowering, mentoring, and discipling). Relationships are 85% of leadership, therefore, elational leaders are focused and intent of the process of developing people (People Development).
Developing a passion for people development and building strong relationship skills are marks of RELATIONAL LEADERS. Relational leaders understand that by serving, developing and empowering people, that this alone will increase their influence with people.