"The purpose for management for churches is not to make them more business-like, but to make them more church-like." - Peter Drucker
Peter Drucker, the late, great leadership expert highlighted in November's issue of Harvard Business Review. Drucker was a tremendous writer, management consultant, and self-described “social ecologist, and also "explored how humans are organized across the business, government and the nonprofit sectors of society."
Drucker leadership wisdom has impacted me in so many ways. However, there is one quote that has stood out to me, here it is, "Non-profits (churches) need management even more than business does, precisely because they lack the discipline of the bottom line...and long-term vision." I have served in churches and non-profits organizations for over 15 years, and the one thing that I have found to be a constant challenge in non-profit/religious environments is the issue of "vision" and the "bottom line." As non-profit/church leaders, we are taught in college/seminary to learn how to be effective bible teachers, preachers, and or course the "marrying and burying of folks." However, "WE" as church leaders are not taught the principles of how to effectively lead and manage an organization.
Whether Christian pastors/leaders would like to admit it or not, there is an organizational management factor in leading a successful church in the 21st century. Therefore, it is critical for pastors to learn how to effectively lead and manage the organization effectively: the organizational vision, mission strategy, staff teams, board teams, networking, volunteer strategy...and the list goes on.
Drucker highlighted leadership principles such as: Decentralization and simplification. Drucker discounted the "command and control" model and asserted that organizations work best when they are decentralized. According to Drucker, organizations (churches) tend to produce too many products (have too many ministries), hire employees they don't need, value effectiveness over efficiency (doing the same thing over and over again) and expand into too many "missions" that they should avoid. There is the problem, non-profits/churches tend to bend toward the "top down" leadership style, while making the (organizational) environment very complex and busy with a lot of "STUFF."